Toppling a Totalitarian Regime in America:
What Can Be Done?
John Stanton and Wayne Madsen
“…Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not
be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience
hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpation's, pursuing
invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute
Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security…” US Declaration of Independence—1776
As July 4, 2002 approaches, Americans can no longer afford to practice armchair democracy and checkbook citizenship. If the public does not rise out of its feeble and hypnotic state, it puts the lives of its children and grandchildren at the disposal of utilitarian political, corporate and
military leaders who view flesh and blood as human capital, easily usable and
disposable in the march for the accumulation of wealth, power and resources. In June 2002, the United States of America resembles the Animal Farm eerily portrayed by George Orwell in 1946--a "farm" run by Mr. Pilkington and the "Pigs."
From November 2000 to June 2002 those who record such events will note that the Bush Regime rushed the United States to the heretofore unseen Stygian depths of greed and corruption, ushered in Gestapo-like treatment and
profiling of US resident aliens and US citizens, pillaged the environment,
education and infrastructure budgets, closed “Peacekeeping Operations” in the
Pentagon, adopted an aggressive nuclear weapons testing and first-use
doctrine, swept aside the checks and balances of the US Constitution--most
notably judicial branch rulings critical of its detainment of anti-US rebels,
and used specious terror warnings to defuse controversy over its Draconian
In a scene out of classic thriller Seven Days in May, Bush asked the broadcast networks for airtime on the evening of June 6, 2002 to announce sweeping changes to the nation’s intelligence and law enforcement bureaucracy, creating a Cabinet-level homeland security department. So, on the 58th anniversary of the Allied invasion of France to liberate Europe from the yoke of fascism, we have a president chiseling into the marbled government infrastructure in Washington the words “homeland security.” The term
“homeland” was used and promoted by the very nation D-Day was meant to
eliminate from the planet.
“Homeland” was also a favorite term of South
Africa’s brutal apartheid regime. That government confined its majority
African population to sham countries it described as “homelands.”
This action and others calls for counteraction by the public and select leaders who should recall the fate of many who dared sign the US Declaration of Independence. According to bethlehempaonline.com, 5 signers were captured by the British as traitors, and tortured before they died. 12 had their homes ransacked and
burned. Two lost their sons serving in the Revolutionary Army; another had 2 sons captured. 9 of the 56 fought and died from wounds or hardships of the
Revolutionary War. 25 were lawyers or jurists. 11 were merchants. 9 were farmers or large plantation owners. One was a teacher, one a musician, and one a printer. “These were men of means and education, yet they signed the Declaration of Independence, knowing full well that the penalty could be death if they were captured.” And they were mostly 20 to 40 year old men. Are there any leaders like these in 2002 who can grapple with the insidious leadership of our country and the sickness that pervades American Society?
Abuses, Usurpations and Negligence
Agence France Press: "…The three-prong National Security Entry/Exit Registration System is in response from the US Justice Department to a mandate issued by Congress to track "virtually all" of the 35 million foreign
visitors who land in the United States annually…Such visitors will be
fingerprinted and photographed at the border, be required to register
"periodically" if they stay in the United States for 30 days or longer…Unfortunately, policies that single out particular religious and
ethnic groups create a false sense of security and end up further damaging America's image and reputation around the world“…The Hartford Courant: “Three separate courts have told the U.S. Justice Department that its secrecy policy regarding the arrest of 1,200 Muslim immigrants after Sept. 11 is illegal. Yet the department, in particular its Immigration and Naturalization Service,
has failed to heed the message…”
The National Center for Children in Poverty: “37 percent of American children
(27 million children) live in low-income families (40 percent of U.S. children under age six—9 million children), in families with incomes below 200 percent of the poverty line ($27,722 for a family of three). Many of the concerns of ‘near poor’ low-income families overlap with those of the poor,
such as the need for well-paying jobs and access to affordable quality childcare and health care. 16 percent of children (over 11 million children) live in poverty (17 percent of children under age six—4 million children), in
families with incomes below the federal poverty line ($13,861 for a family of
three in 2000). About the name number of children lived in poverty in 1980.” The United States’ child poverty rate is substantially higher—often two-to-three times higher—than that of most other major Western
industrialized nations. The child poverty rate is highest for African-American (30 percent) and Latino (28 percent) children. The child
poverty rate for white children is 9 percent. The poverty rate for children
under age six follows a similar pattern: 33 percent for African-American
children under age six, 29 percent for Latino young children, and 10 percent
for white young children. 6 percent of America’s children (5 million) live in extreme poverty (8 percent under age six—2 million children), in families with incomes below half the poverty line. (In 2000, the extreme poverty line was $6,930 for a family of three.)…
Council for a Livable World: “The Administration is requesting a military
budget of $396.1 billion in fiscal 2003, a 1-year increase of $45.3. This
will be the largest increase in military budget authority since fiscal 1966 at the height of the Vietnam War. The increase alone is larger that the military budget of all other countries beside Japan, whose budget is $45.6
billion. In fiscal 2007, the National Defense budget is slated to increase to
$469.6 billion. While the budget is being touted for fighting terrorism, the
bulk of the funding goes for buying weapons and a force structure designed during the Cold War,not ‘transformation’ systems such as precision-guided bombs and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs).”
Business Week: “PricewaterhouseCoopers forecasts that 11,000 companies will file for Chapter 11 protection in 2002, up from a record 10,442 in 2001.”
Workingforamerica.com: “Since January 1, 2002, there have been 555,783 layoffs with Hewlett Packard announcing up to 15,000. US unemployment was 6 percent in April 2002…The states face budget shortfalls totaling $27
billion…June 2002.” American Society for Civil Engineers: “D+ for US
infrastructure…$1.3 trillion needed to fix roads, sewage systems, drinking water, schools, roads, bridges….” The United Nations: “…global warming of between 1 and 3.5 degrees C over the coming century. This may not sound like cause for concern, but the global average temperature has changed by no more than one degree C up or down for the past ten thousand years. Industrialized countries, with roughly 20 per cent of the global population, account for 60
per cent of annual emissions of carbon dioxide, and the biggest emitter, the United States, alone accounts for over 20 per cent. Of cumulative CO2 emissions from 1950 to 1992 -- these gases stay in the atmosphere for years -- industrialized countries account for 74 per cent and the US for 28 per
cent. Emissions by developing countries, although growing rapidly, are not expected to equal those of industrialized countries until 2035.
Sentencingproject.org: “Roughly 2 million inmates crowd US prisons and jails. The US incarcerates 690 out of every 100,000 Americans. This makes the USA the world leader in incarceration ahead of Russia which jails 676 per 100,000. These figures exclude the millions on probation, house arrest, illegally detained under the guise of the War on Terrorism and War on Drugs,
and the disproportionate number of African Americans, Latino Americans and Central Asian/Middle Eastern Americans imprisoned.”
“111 countries have abolished the death penalty in law or practice. 7 countries since 1990 are known to have executed prisoners who were under 18 years old at the time of the crime - Congo (Democratic Republic), Iran,
Nigeria, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, USA and Yemen. The country which carried out
the greatest number of known executions of child offenders was the USA (15 since 1990). Amnesty International recorded three executions of child offenders in 2001: one in Iran, one in Pakistan and one in the USA.”
Islam-usa.co (Shahid Athar, Associate Professor—Indiana University): “Yes we
are number one. We are number one not only as a superpower and being the wealthiest and strongest nation, but the highest in crime as well. For
100,000 people, the U.S. has a homicide rate of 9.4 while that of the U.K. is 2, and Japan 1.2 for comparison. Though we are number one among those who believe in the commandment ‘thou shalt not steal,’ we have also the highest number of robberies. Per 100,000 population, the figure for the U.S. is 45;
U.K. 9; Japan 1. We are also number one in the number of drug offenders. Per 100,000 population, the U.S. has 346 drug offenders as compared to the U.K. of 56, and Japan of 1. More American women are raped than any other country
in the world. Per 100,000 women, the rape incidents are 114 in the U.S., 9 in the U.K., and 7 in Japan. 4 million women are physically abused every year by their husbands or boyfriends and forced to seek emergency treatment. Domestic
violence leads to the death of 2000 women every year. 25% of all attempted suicide by women is by those who were battered.”
Live from Moscow on June 10, 2002, with the Kremlin as a backdrop, Attorney General John Ashcroft announced the military's ownership of an
American citizen--and Chicago street gang member--Jose Padilla, seized on May 8, 2002 by the US Justice Department for allegedly talking about a "dirty bomb"- -a claim which European military officials find specious and timed to
counter the Bush Regime's 911 negligence. On June 12, from Qatar, Donald Rumsfeld made the stunning announcement that "We're not interested in
trying him at the moment…. We're not interested in punishing him at the
moment. We're interested in finding out what in the world he knows." With those statements, made on the soil of these foreign countries, Americans were put on notice that the Bill of Rights have been suspended and superceded
by military law. With this abominable decapitation of US justice, and the nightmare that is the PATRIOT Act, Americans have seen perhaps the most brazen usurpation of their rights and liberties in their history.
And the list is almost endless.
What Can be Done?
The Electoral College should be eliminated, as its presence is as sinister as
the interests and money that has corrupted the USpolitical process. As pointed out in the San Francisco Chronicle, “…to persuade southern colonies to join the new union, they [the founding fathers] had to recognize the
South's right to perpetuate a slave system that treated human beings as chattel. After months of dickering, they found a way around this political impasse. Their decision to base congressional representation on each state's population worked just fine for the more populous North, but not for the slave states, where only a small number of free whites lived. So they devised
an ingenious solution, appropriately called the Great Compromise. All free
men -- plus three-fifths of all slaves -- would count toward the apportionment of representatives. What this meant is that a handful of free slaveholding southern white men would now be well represented in Congress
because they could count three-fifths of their slaves as part of their state's population. That solved one problem. But the founding fathers faced yet another political dilemma. If the colonists decided to elect their president by direct vote, the South would have been vastly outnumbered by the more populous northern colonies. As they drafted the constitution, James
Madison of Virginia worried that a popular vote would undermine the political
power of the southern colonies.”
Indeed the reliance on such an antediluvian system that also involves walking
to a voting booth is entirely dysfunctional in a time of commonplace Internet-based banking and stock trading, telework, teleconferencing,
automated battlespace management. Moreover, it puts voters at risk. Why chance walking a city street or assembling under the watchful eyes of hidden cameras or spiteful officials? Why risk votes not being counted in the electoral process? Why must the individual put herself in danger when the
elected and unelected CYA themselves at the first sign of danger? Are they worth more than the individuals that make up the public? An automated registering and voting process adopting processes used for Internet-based financial transactions must be implemented. If the US is to retain its damaged electoral system, then United Nation’s appointed observers must be enlisted to monitor US polling places.
And as the US Capitol, White House and Federal Buildings become off-limits to the public—and their occupants safely secure and governing from remote and alternative locations—its seems pointless other than for quaintness to
assemble the governing organizations in one central point in Washington, DC.
The US Capitol is now symbol, not substance, and, as such, national governance could be conducted through regional gatherings where those elected and appointed would be forced to face constituents 24 x 7.
The US Constitution must be amended to include national referenda and confidence measures that collar and leash those in power to the public. To begin this and other changes to the US system of government, a national petition-for-change drive must be undertaken via the Internet in conjunction
with a nonviolent change-movement involving nationwide demonstrations. These
efforts can be organized through Indymedia and the hundreds of nonprofits
that include Americans from every walk of life.
Instead of targeting nations for preemptive nuclear and conventional attack,
US governing leaders should call a worldwide summit at a neutral location to address global inequities that lead to despair, hatred and hunger. Former Presidents Jimmy Carter and Gerald Ford would do the nation a great service by immediately calling for such a meeting. Invitees must include those
nations who have most suffered most from ill conceived US and Western
European policies. Critics of such calls are fond of dismissing diplomacy,
but aggressively remind of the noble US effort to rebuild Europe after WWII.
They would do well to support such a cause that includes the “non-white” resource-rich playgrounds of empires new and old. Brutish capitalism must give way to reasoned generosity, along with enlightened US reentrance into the global community to be evidenced by adoption of protocols and treaties
gutted by the current Regime. For starters, the US must sign-on to the International
Criminal Court, Convention on the Banning of Landmines, Conventions on Children in War, and the Kyoto Protocols.
Additionally, the dividing line that once stood between US civilian and military elements must be reestablished and widened. The "revolving door"
that places retired military officers in charge of US diplomacy and national
"Blue Ribbon Panels", places them on the boards of major corporations who
seek defense contracts--and allows them to spin media coverage of events and
advocate military/industrial policies--should be shut down. And many of these
retired military officers are advocates of using federal troops to police the
United States, ostensibly for Homeland Defense. Although there are some enlightened dissenters among them.
Dr. William Burcham, a former US Navy officer--and a member of a group that opposes the establishment of the US Army's Northern "Homeland"
Command--indicates that it is time to counteract the efforts of the Bush Regime. "Since 911 there has been a steady pressure exerted by some in the
current administration to infringe upon the civil liberties of US citizens in
attempts to make their own functions easier to accomplish. Now is not the
time to stand by and allow further erosion of the US Constitution for the
benefit of these few. Anxious times make for poor policy decisions. US constitutional tradition and years of political wisdom, combined with national experience, clearly indicate the people do not support the use of
federal troops for law enforcement purposes." Orwell sounded such a warning
56 years ago through his characters in Animal Farm: "…Then there came a
moment when the first shock had worn off and when, in spite of everything—in
spite of…the habit, developed through long years, of never complaining, never criticizing, no matter what happened—they might have uttered some word of
But they didn't.
John Stanton is a Virginia-based writer on national security affairs and
Wayne Madsen is a Washington, DC-based investigative journalist who writes
and comments frequently on civil liberties and human rights issues.